{"id":7237,"date":"2019-12-12T09:27:02","date_gmt":"2019-12-12T09:27:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.walkme.com\/blog\/?p=7237"},"modified":"2019-12-12T09:27:02","modified_gmt":"2019-12-12T09:27:02","slug":"experiential-learning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.walkme.com\/blog\/experiential-learning\/","title":{"rendered":"Experiential learning: Types, examples & best practices"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The modern workplace is facing a familiar learning and development<\/a> (L&D) challenge. Time and again, employees complete training but still feel unprepared when difficulties arise or when they are put under pressure. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The gap between knowing and doing is becoming more pronounced as expectations for functional skills rise and traditional training fails to keep pace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Research shows that 60\u201370% of development programs are expected to be based on experiential learning by the end of 2024<\/a>, reflecting a major shift toward learning by doing rather than passive instruction. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Embracing real-world practices creates an innate ability to learn in the flow of work<\/a>. This means knowledge becomes more intuitive, and outcomes are more reliable. Experiential learning embeds skills through action and reflection so people feel prepared and confident in often unpredictable work environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This article explores experiential learning, focusing on how real involvement, sustained reflection, and structured guidance turn everyday tasks into indicative growth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is experiential learning?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Experiential learning is an eLearning<\/a> method that develops employees’ skills<\/a> through direct action, instantaneous feedback, and structured reflection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather than treating training as separate from daily responsibilities, experiential approaches use real tasks as the core learning material. Pragmatic challenges, successes, and mistakes are the raw input for understanding how a process works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Learning deepens when those experiences are consciously reviewed, and reflection clarifies cause and effect, highlights why certain choices led to better outcomes, and uncovers habits that may be limiting performance. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Insight from this review then shapes the next attempt, creating a continuous cycle of practice and refinement. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kolb\u2019s learning theory describes this cycle as experience, reflection, conceptualization, and experimentation. When all four stages are present, skills develop in a manner that is durable and ready for application under pressure. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Experiential learning, therefore, constitutes a comprehensive system for translating real-world activity into lasting expertise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why is experiential learning important?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Learning through direct action builds confidence that scripted or traditional training rarely delivers. Real tasks expose pressure points, unexpected variables, and the decisions that shape outcomes, giving people a far deeper grasp of what success looks like in practice. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Concepts stop feeling abstract once they\u2019re tested in live workplace situations, and the understanding that emerges tends to stick for longer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Practical experience also exposes weaknesses that would otherwise go unnoticed. When someone gets hands-on experience with a new tool or method, their questions highlight where instructions were unclear or where extra guidance would remove friction. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

These insights stimulate improvement more readily because they derive from genuine use rather than assumptions, and progress is more predictable when skills develop in this way. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Each learning attempt sharpens judgment and strengthens adaptability<\/a> to changing conditions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over time, experiential learning establishes a solid foundation for consistent, reliable employee performance<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are the differences between experiential, immersive, and traditional learning?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Understanding how the following learning types differ helps clarify what each method can realistically deliver. Clear distinctions make it far easier to choose the right approach for hands-on skill development rather than relying on guesswork or outdated assumptions: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Experiential learning<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Experiential learning builds proficiency through action. Skills develop as individuals undertake tasks, reflect on outcomes, and adjust their approach. The strength of this method lies in exposing challenges early, so that improvements arise from lived experience rather than theory. Learning is practical, adaptable, and shaped by direct engagement with the task itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Immersive learning<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Immersive learning places individuals in a simulated environment that replicates real-world conditions. Virtual scenarios, branching choices, and controlled challenges create a sense of presence that boosts focus and memory. It\u2019s ideal when hands-on practice carries risk or cost, offering lifelike repetition without disrupting responsibilities or exposing anyone to errors that matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Traditional learning <\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Traditional learning delivers information through structured instruction. Content is presented first, with practice usually happening later. This approach is appropriate for situations in which clarity, sequencing, and foundational explanations are paramount. It provides stability and consistency, though it relies on learners to transfer theoretical understanding into practical action once they leave the training setting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are the different styles of experiential learning?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Experiential learning comes in many forms, each offering a different way to practise, test, and refine skills through workplace action. Understanding these styles clarifies which approach provides the appropriate level of challenge, guidance, or realism for the outcome you aim to achieve: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Style<\/strong><\/td>Best Suited For<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
Experiencing<\/strong><\/td>Hands-on tasks that rely on real-time trial, error, and adjustment<\/td><\/tr>
Imagining<\/strong><\/td>Mapping out scenarios or potential choices before taking action<\/td><\/tr>
Reflecting<\/strong><\/td>Post-task review, where insights appear after stepping back<\/td><\/tr>
Analyzing<\/strong><\/td>Breaking down complex situations into smaller, understandable parts<\/td><\/tr>
Thinking<\/strong><\/td>Moments that require deeper reasoning or careful interpretation<\/td><\/tr>
Deciding<\/strong><\/td>Situations with several viable options that need a clear direction<\/td><\/tr>
Acting<\/strong><\/td>Tasks where momentum and direct feedback accelerate progress<\/td><\/tr>
Initiating<\/strong><\/td>Projects that stall due to overplanning or hesitation<\/td><\/tr>
Balancing<\/strong><\/td>Work involving shifting conditions or competing priorities<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Experiencing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Experiencing centres on learning through direct involvement, where someone steps into a digital workflow<\/a> or task and navigates it moment by moment. Progress comes from observing outcomes as they unfold, adjusting instinctively, and forming a natural feel for the work. It\u2019s a style that builds confidence through exposure, helping skills sink in through repeated real-world encounters rather than through theory alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Imagining<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Imagining encourages exploration before action by picturing scenarios, constraints, and possible outcomes. Individuals map situations in their minds, rehearse decisions, and consider alternative routes to success. This style offers space to test ideas without consequence, creating mental models that make future actions clearer and more intentional once it\u2019s time to apply them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Reflecting<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Reflecting focuses on stepping back after an experience to evaluate what worked, what didn\u2019t, and why. It slows everything down so insights can materialize without pressure. Patterns are then easier to spot, enabling adjustments to approaches with greater awareness. This style turns ordinary tasks and processes into sources of long-term insight and more thoughtful behaviour.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Analyzing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Analysis involves a deeper examination by breaking situations into smaller parts and studying how they connect. Managers seek underlying causes, review evidence, and evaluate options based on facts rather than intuition. It suits situations in which clarity depends on structured thinking and a measured approach helps prevent rushed decisions or repeated oversights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thinking<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Thinking provides individuals with space to process ideas, weigh scenarios, and develop reasoning that supports future decisions. It\u2019s less about gathering new information and more about organizing given knowledge. This style strengthens judgment by helping people form clearer conclusions and articulate why a particular path feels right before committing to any action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Deciding<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Deciding is about narrowing choices and selecting a viable path forward. It consolidates input from earlier exploration and articulates a clear direction. Deciding also sharpens accountability, encouraging individuals to act with purpose rather than hesitation, especially when time-sensitive tasks demand commitment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Acting<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Acting converts intention into movement. For example, when someone takes a planned step, observes the immediate outcome, and adjusts quickly. It reinforces learning by pairing every decision with a visible result, making progress easy to interpret. Situations in which momentum matters more than lengthy consideration and where practical feedback drives improvement will be most suited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Initiating<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Initiating emphasizes taking the first step without waiting for complete certainty. It teaches individuals to recognize when \u201cgood enough to start\u201d is preferable to delaying in pursuit of perfect outcomes. This style nurtures confidence by showing that clarity often emerges after action begins, not before, and that early movement unlocks opportunities that planning alone can\u2019t reach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Balancing<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Balancing blends awareness, judgement, and adaptability. Someone mulls over competing priorities, adjusts their pace, and chooses actions that maintain stability under pressure. It\u2019s a style that rewards composure, helping individuals stay focused on broader goals while managing shifting demands. Balance then becomes a skill shaped through practice rather than by prescribed rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How to implement experiential learning in the workplace <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"How<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Experiential learning works best when people can build real understanding through direct involvement. Learning how to implement experiential learning in the workplace provides a clear route to apply, test, and reflect based on experience: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Experiential learning activities<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Practical tasks work best when they mirror something employees recognize or form part of their daily role. Start with a simple scenario that reflects a real challenge and let people walk through it step by step. Keep the task small enough to finish in one sitting so nobody feels lost. Then, give a clear goal at the start so participants know what they\u2019re building toward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Built-in moments for reflection<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Short pauses help people identify what has honestly changed for them during an activity. Ask direct, easy questions such as \u201cWhat felt unfamiliar?\u201d or \u201cWhat would you tweak next time?\u201d Encourage people to write quick notes so their thoughts don\u2019t slip away. A simple, relaxed chat after each exercise helps them connect the experience to future tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Space to try, fail, and improve<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Learning is more effective when people feel safe enough to experiment. Set up low-risk tasks where nothing breaks if someone gets it wrong. Make it clear that early attempts are only practice rounds. Once employees are comfortable, offer gentle pointers rather than fixes so approaches are shaped organically. Always try to give them another go straight away while the experience is fresh.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Learning from others\u2019 experiences<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Real stories grounded in reality stick better than long-winded explanations. Invite team members to share a moment when they solved a tricky issue and explain what sparked their breakthrough. Keep these stories short and honest, and encourage listeners to pick one takeaway they can try themselves. A quick follow-up meeting makes it easier to turn someone else\u2019s experience into personal progress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On-the-job guided practice<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Coaching helps people apply new ideas with confidence. Start with a small task and stand by while they take the lead, offering brief prompts only when they\u2019re stuck. After the task, provide clear, specific feedback focused on one area for improvement. Let them try the same task again with their new insight, so the improvement sets in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are some workplace examples of experiential learning? <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Looking at examples of experiential learning in the workplace is the best way to give you a feel for how different scenarios play out in real life: <\/p>\n\n\n\n